Abortion Essays (616 words) - Abortion In The United States

Abortion Shane Woolf Per. B1 9-15-01 Abortion What is a human? A human by definition is a biological being that belongs to the species Homo sapiens that is unique from every other being. Now the question that many people are asking is: Is a baby that is unborn a human? Many believe that it is, including me. For one, it has 46 human chromosomes. Another thing is that it is ALIVE, meaning it is growing, developing, maturing, and replacing its own dying cells. However, many people dont feel that an unborn baby is a human; they do not feel like it is alive. It is every bit alive. I am Pro-Life, and abortions are morally wrong. There are many people that are Pro-Choice, however, and they base their opinions on that the fetus is not actually alive, just a mass of tissue. They also feel that every child should be a wanted child, and if the mother does not want to have the child, the baby will be unwanted, and an unwanted child will more than likely be abused. They also feel that if abortions are illegal, a woman that gets raped and becomes pregnant will not be able to get help and will be forced to have the child as a remembrance of that horrible situation for the rest of their life. If we outlaw abortions, then back-alley abortion clinics will open again is also a popular belief among Pro-Choice people. The Pro-Choice people bring up some very good points, but the killing of an innocent human being is unforgivable. It is wrong, and should never be done under any circumstance. Rape should be punished, but a child conceived in this manner should not be killed. Outside abortion clinics are also morally wrong, and should not be open. A constitutional amendment should be passed that gives equal rights to all living human beings, even those that are yet unborn. A woman who does not want her child, should put the child up for adoption, not have an abortion and not even give the child a chance to live. Adoptions are good things, abortions are not. Abortions do not give children the chance to live. We are killing the child even before the child has a chance to do anything. I mean, if you have an abortion, you could be killing the next Albert Einstein, or even the next Michael Jordan. Give the child the chance to live. The court case Roe v. Wade in 1973 was one of the most important and demoralizing decision that the Supreme Court has ever made. In this decision, they stated that it was alright for people to have an abortion. It stated that abortions could be done within the first 3 months. It also stated that abortions could be done up until birth if one registered doctor thought it would be best for the mothers health. This decision was wrong, and we should go back and fight it again. Abortions are wrong, there is just no other way of putting it. If killing a person that is already born yet alive is wrong, then why is killing an unborn baby that is alive not wrong? It is, and this feeling is shared with many people all around the world. You are killing the child without it getting a chance at life. If you dont want the baby, go through with the pregnancy, and then give it up for adoption, at least this way, you are giving it a chance to live. You never know whom you could be killing when you have an abortion. 594 Words Speech and Communications

buy custom Due Process essay

buy custom Due Process essay Under the constitution, it is likely to find one or more law that conflict with the other. However, this is got rid of by clauses under each law. The Fifth Amendment requires the federal government to observe the code that no person shall be dispossessed basic rights such as life, liberty, or property with exemption of due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment, approved in 1868, depends on the due process clause to depict a legal responsibility of all countries. This measure is done to observe that all parties in any case receive fair and equal treatment in the period of case preparation and presentation. INCORPORATION OF DUE PROCESS The Fifth Amendment's allusion to due process is simply one of countless assurances of safeguarding the Bill of Rights. A lot of changes occurred in the Twentieth Century. A number of Supreme Court rulings observed that the due process clause had the basic elements of bill of rights. That was about a century later after the incorporation of the due process clause in the 19th century. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits any state from launching separated institution or else astute individuals against some of their society members. The bill of right lacks the clause for equal protection. Therefore, the due process clause provides the basic protection against breaching or contradicting how the bill of rights is carried out. The due process clause observes equality when carrying out necessary measures to protect the law and the citizen. Without the due process clause, it would be extremely easy to tamper with a case before presentation to the law courts. With the due process in place, it is easy to understand why the saying, one remains innocent until proven otherwise by a court of law. The term due process, as it sounds, reflects on the procedure taken to protect and respect person legal rights. This is the period before the presentation of a case in a law court. The due process is used to balance and equate the law and moreover protect persons. If due process is not followed, it leads to violation of the rule of law (Hartigan, 2003). ADVERSARIAL SYSTEM The adversarial system is a combination of elements that constitute the presentation of a case. This comprises of the due process observation, presentation of arguments by both parties and gathering and submission of evidenc. The final part of this system is questioning of third party entity, the witness, under provided rules to determine a witness. Through this system the neutral entity, judge or jury, remains neutral throughout the procedure of the system. When the procedure is through, it is the work of the neutral entity to determine the truth and settle the case. The controversy behind the adversary system that lays a platform for the due process is, it accessibility. The adversary system is sometimes known to favor the wealthy people of the society by creating loopholes in the system. To make maters worse the adversary system is also known to be fast paced on resolving conflicts rather than being an investigative system that seeks the truth only. The majority, with limited resources, are mostly locked out of enjoying the benefits of the due process through the adversary system. Other loophole present in the adversarial system is the idea that even if a person admits being guilty, the prosecutor evidence has to prove that (Wasserman, 2004). RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED It may sound funny but any person accused of any crime is objected to enjoy his freedom of all rights in the bill of rights until they are proven guilty. For such a person to enjoy their rights, the due process and the adversarial system must be fair to all parties. For a person to be deemed guilty, the prosecutor must provide enough evidence to prove the person accused actually committed a crime. Above all, things, the defendant must be protected from self-incrimination. Self-incrimination can be achieved through torture or blackmail. The accused person is entitled to remain silent till they come across their defending legal counsel. If the counsel is not available, the accused has the right to be provided with adequate legal representation provided by the court. One cannot be charged under the same crime twice. When a case starts, the accused has the right to free and speedy trial at the court of law. In case, a citizen is accused of a crime, before a search is done on their premis es, the police must obtain a search warrant. In case of the witnesses, the accused is free to bring their own witnesses. PROCESS AFTER CRIME IS COMMITED First, it is the work of the security officers to determine whether a crime has at any chance been committed. Such work is left to the security officers since they are equipped with resources to investigate and determine the extent of a crime. Investigations involve, talking to close witnesses and gathering other relevant evidence form the crime scene. Evidence collection can go a step ahead to make a case more valid by videotaping and photographing. After all that is done, the police start to determine the probable answers to the cause of the crime. All this is done through recording the statements of both parties involved in the crime (Hartigan, 2003).A follow up investigation is done to arrest the offender or seize illegal goods. After investigation are through by the law enforcement agency. After the police agency is through with their investigation, the case is filed to the corresponding prosecuting attorney. The prosecutor reviews the case and determines which evidence is reliable and the step ahead. If the case is valid, the prosecutor determines under what offense the crime is to be filed. If the evidence is not reliable to put a tough case, the case is readmitted for further investigation or nullified. POST ARREST PROCEDURE If the prosecutor feels that there is enough evidence to put a tough case, the accused is arrested. However, this is not to mean that the accused is guilty. Before one is fully tried and a sentence is issued, a lot happens. Most of The arrests are warrantless. When one is arrested, they are then transported to jail and booked. When being booked, the person details are filled in an occurrence book. The booking is extremely beneficial as it is an administrative process. Activities carried out in booking includes, accused name, contact, place of work, phone details, and next of kin information. The defendant is also photographed and their fingerprints taken. After the arrest, one is entitled to make three phone calls to inform their lawyer or their people. The person arrested, remains in jail till they are bailed or they appear in arraignment. Next is the preliminary hearing, followed by plea-bargaining. CONCLUSION Under any circumstance, the law is the only friend of an accused person. No person has the authority to deny a person from that only friend. All clauses in the law are meant to protect any accused citizen. The due process allows any accused person to enjoy all rights in the bill of right before being deemed guilty by a court of law. The adversarial system has all the elements to enable the due process to take the course with no contradiction of the law. Buy custom Due Process essay